I
know writers who write well. I also know writers whose works are, at least to
me, barely readable. I know broke writers and wealthy writers, writers of
novels, historical romances, science fiction and fantasy. I know a poet or two,
and song writers and journalists, and flash writers whose stories are never
more than a few lines at most.
Writing,
I believe, is nothing more than a craft. We work with words rather than, say,
wood. We learn the basic rules and apply them.
Grammar
is important, as are sentence structure and clarity. We find ways not to overburden
the prose and after a while we come to realize that very good writing often
depends on what is not written or
even alluded to. Good writing promises and delivers. Bad writing promises and
does not.
Excellent
writing, which is much rarer, has windows and doors that allow the reader to
become part of the story being told. Excellent writing invites you into the
house, serves tea and madeleines, and then, as you’re inspecting the art work
on the walls, it delivers the knockout punch. You don’t see the punch coming,
nor do you feel it. You simply and suddenly find yourself knocked flat on your
butt, almost breathless, certainly stunned, and grateful for it.
It’s
only after you know most of the guiding principles of your craft that you can
begin to take liberties, and you’ll do this at great risks.
I
once had the pleasure of meeting Hunter Thompson, the creator and best purveyor
of gonzo journalism. Thompson, despite his massive success, would say he never
felt totally comfortable bending the rules of reporting. He did it anyway because
he had to. The traditional media, he thought, was largely spineless, uninspired,
and seldom really interested in reporting facts. Thompson believed the only way
to write and to pass on the passion he felt was to put himself inexorably in
the epicenter of his story. He would become part and parcel of the tale, grab
its audience by the scruff of neck and drag the readers—sometime as they kicked
and screamed—into his writing.
He
appeared to be an easy read but wasn’t. What occasionally seemed like the
ravings of a deranged man was actually wonderfully composed and powerful prose.
He stirred a new generation of writers, none of whom to date have even come
close to achieving his level of sagacity.
At
the other end of the spectrum are good writers who have dumbed themselves down
to please a greater readership. That’s an art as well, though perhaps a less
satisfying one.
Me,
I’m nowhere near the level where I can go off the beaten track and establish anything
totally my own. I still ape writers better than I am, and I still struggle with
some of the most basic rules.
That’s
okay. I’ll get there or maybe not.
Progress,
not perfection.
I loved this piece Thierry.
ReplyDelete